That places Double Stuf Oreos in the same range as the Subway sub that’s the subject of a lawsuit because it’s ‘between 5 and 8.3 percent short’ of a foot long. The Most Stuf has three times the amount of creme as. That means the creme in a Double Stuf Oreo is 7 percent lighter than two times the creme in a regular Oreo. Double Stuf has long been the creamiest option for those who love the vanilla filling, but its since been unseated by the Mega Stuf. The plaintiffs allege, in fact, that Subway subs ‘are anywhere between 5 and 8.3 percent short.’īut consider that Anderson’s students determined that the filling in a Double Stuf Oreo weighs only 1.86 times more than does the filling in a regular Oreo. Still, since the weight difference wasn’t that big, they managed to get out of this unfavorable situation without any damaging consequences. Therefore the company faced a lawsuit for false advertising. Oreos in the same range as the Subway sub thats the subject of a lawsuit. And each came in its own plastic package, perfect for sneaking into your little tykes knapsack. This little research showed that the double stuf Oreos weighed a little under twice the regular Oreos. Oreo Double Stuf Gluten Free Chocolate Sandwich Cookies - Bulk Grocery Pack of. In those cases, now consolidated in federal court, several plaintiffs sued Subway over claims the chain’s ‘footlong’ sub is not a full 12 inches long. The Oreo Big Stuf was an oversized cookie sold as an on-the-run snack, three inches in diameter, 316 calories, with 13 grams of fat. Rather, the real amount is approximately 1.86 times the 'stuf,' and honestly, we feel a little. The prospects of an Oreo lawsuit might have appeared slim were it not for a series of lawsuits that were launched just this year against the sandwich chain Subway. After weighing several regular Oreos, Double Stuf, and Mega Stuf Oreos, and doing some basic mathematical calculations, Anderson discovered that Double Stuf Oreos do not, in fact, have exactly twice as much filling as their regular Oreo counterparts. What import does this hold for the future of mankind? Of Nabisco? Can the baker expect to be hauled into court for false advertising?īaylen Linnekin, the article’s author and a food lawyer by trade, fears “the next step might be litigation.”
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |